Removable twin block functional appliance in the treatment of class ii division 2 malocclusion

March 12, 2014

Removable Twin Block functional appliance in the treatment of class ii division 2 malocclusion

This is an automatically generated default intro template – please do not edit.

General information
Title:	Removable Twin Block functional appliance in the treatment of class ii division 2 malocclusion
Meta keywords:
Meta description:
Images information
Images path absolute:	/home/studia/public_html/v15/images/stories/com_form2content/p3/f367
Images path relative:	com_form2content/p3/f367
Thumbs path absolute:
Thumbs path relative:
Fields information
Article_Title:	Removable twin block functional appliance in the treatment of class ii division 2 malocclusion
Authors:	Delia Elena Daragiu, Doina Lucia Ghergic
Affiliation:	“Titu Maiorescu” University, Faculty of Dental Medicine
Abstract:	This case report shows the treatment effects of class II division 2 malocclusion in a 10 years old boy with twin block functional appliance. The treatment consists of two stages: First stage- treatment with removable twin block functional appliance followed later by second stage: fixed appliances to correct the position, the torque of upper central incisors.
Keywords:	class II division 2 malocclusion, class II skeletal base, functional appliance, Twin Block
References:	Clark, W.J., The twin block traction technique, European Journal of Orthodontics, 4, 129-138, 1982 Dyer FMV, McKeown HF, Sandler PJ, The modified Twin Block Appliance in the treatment of class II division 2 malocclusions, Journal of Orthodontics, vol.28, 217-280, 2001 Illing H.M., Morris DO, Lee RT, A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances, Part1-the hard tissues, European Journal of Orthodontics,20, 501-516, 1998 Lund DI, Sandler PJ, The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlledstudy, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 113, 104-110, 1998 Mills CM, McCullouch KJ, Treatment effects of the Twin Block appliance: a cephalometric study, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 114, 15-21, 1998 Selwyn Barnett BJ, Rationale of treatmentfor Class II division 2 malocclusion, British Journalof Orthodontics, 18, 173-181, 1991 Selwyn Barnet BJ, Class II division 2 malocclusion: a method of planning and treatment, British Journal of Orthodontics, 23, 29-36, 1996 Trenmouth MJ, Cephalometric evalution of the Twin Block appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusionwith matched normative growth data, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 117, 54-59
Read_full_article:	pdf/23-2013/23-2013/SU23-2-14Daragiu.pdf
Correspondence:	Delia Elena Daragiu, “Titu Maiorescu” University, Faculty of Dental Medicine

	Read full article
Article Title:	Removable twin block functional appliance in the treatment of class ii division 2 malocclusion
Authors:	Delia Elena Daragiu, Doina Lucia Ghergic
Affiliation:	“Titu Maiorescu” University, Faculty of Dental Medicine
Abstract:	This case report shows the treatment effects of class II division 2 malocclusion in a 10 years old boy with twin block functional appliance. The treatment consists of two stages: First stage- treatment with removable twin block functional appliance followed later by second stage: fixed appliances to correct the position, the torque of upper central incisors.
Keywords:	class II division 2 malocclusion, class II skeletal base, functional appliance, Twin Block
References:	Clark, W.J., The twin block traction technique, European Journal of Orthodontics, 4, 129-138, 1982 Dyer FMV, McKeown HF, Sandler PJ, The modified Twin Block Appliance in the treatment of class II division 2 malocclusions, Journal of Orthodontics, vol.28, 217-280, 2001 Illing H.M., Morris DO, Lee RT, A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances, Part1-the hard tissues, European Journal of Orthodontics,20, 501-516, 1998 Lund DI, Sandler PJ, The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlledstudy, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 113, 104-110, 1998 Mills CM, McCullouch KJ, Treatment effects of the Twin Block appliance: a cephalometric study, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 114, 15-21, 1998 Selwyn Barnett BJ, Rationale of treatmentfor Class II division 2 malocclusion, British Journalof Orthodontics, 18, 173-181, 1991 Selwyn Barnet BJ, Class II division 2 malocclusion: a method of planning and treatment, British Journal of Orthodontics, 23, 29-36, 1996 Trenmouth MJ, Cephalometric evalution of the Twin Block appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusionwith matched normative growth data, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 117, 54-59
*Correspondence:	Delia Elena Daragiu, “Titu Maiorescu” University, Faculty of Dental Medicine

About The Author

dti