The evaluation of early viral response (RVT) and the assessment of haematological adverse effects


The evaluation of early viral response (RVT) and the assessment of haematological adverse effects

This is an automatically generated default intro template – please do not edit.


General information


Title: The evaluation of early viral response (RVT) and the assessment of haematological adverse effects
Meta keywords:
Meta description:

Images information


Images path absolute: /storage/sites/www.studiauniversitatis.ro/images/stories/com_form2content/p3/f394
Images path relative: com_form2content/p3/f394
Thumbs path absolute:
Thumbs path relative:

Fields information


Article_Title: The evaluation of early viral response (RVT) and the assessment of haematological adverse effects
Authors: Veronica Grec, Eftimie Miuțescu
Affiliation: Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Dental Medicine, ″Vasile Goldis″ Western University of Arad, Romania
Abstract: The clinical consequence of chronic hepatitis C, the most important one is progressive liver fibrosis leading to cirrhosis, the last one may complicate in its turn with portal hypertension, liver failure and / or hepatocellular carcinoma. Recognition of fibrosis as an "engine" of cirrhogenous evolution of liver disease brought the need to assess this element in daily practice. Traditionally, liver biopsy followed by anatomopathological examination of the product is used for the assessment of liver fibrosis. In recent years, this invasive method associated with lower mortality, but constant (no series of liver biopsies punctures in the world published without associated mortality), which has limitations related to inter – and intra- observer, underestimation of hepatic cirrhosis and cost is replaced by noninvasive methods of usual assessment. Decreased blood cell response to therapy always occurs and can be grounds for a reduction of dosage or discontinuation. At 3 months of therapy, 76 % of patients had anemia, leucopenia 77 % and 41 % thrombocytopenia. Advanced Fibrosis is a major predictor of morbidity and mortality in chronic liver disease. Despite its limitations, liver biopsy remains the main method for staging liver fibrosis. Non-invasive tests are superior in detecting fibrosis as a dynamic phenomenon and in monitoring antifibrotic therapy. Using noninvasive methods (FibroMax) as first-line diagnostic protocol of liver fibrosis can avoid puncture in most patients. Noninvasive test results will be interpreted in clinical context. When results are unexplained liver puncture is indicated. Algorithm that associates biopsy and serological tests may become the best way of staging and monitoring of liver fibrosis.
Keywords: early viral response; viral C hepatitis; fibrosis
References: Shaw-Stffel T. Reference to Hepatitis C infection. London: Science Press 2004
Kim WR. Global epidemiology and burden of hepatitis C. Microbes and infection 2002; 4: 1119-1125
Lauer GM, Walker BD. Hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 41-52
Wasley A, Alter MJ. Epidemiology of hepatitis C: geographic differences and temporal trends. Semin liver dis 2000; 20:1-16
Armstrong GL,Alter MJ, McQuillianGM et al. The past incidence of hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology 2000;31:777-782
Hoofnagle JH. Hepatitis C. The Clinical Spectrum of Desease. Hepatology 1997; 26:15-20
Feitelson MA. Hepatitis C Virus: From Laboratory to Clinic. Cambridge University Press, 2002
Alter JH, Conry- Catilena C, Melpolder J et al. Hepatitis C in asymptomatic blood donors. Hepatology 1997; 26:29-33
Schvarcz R, Johansson B, Nystrom B. Nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus. Infection 1997; 25: 74-77
Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Isselbacher KJ et al. Harrison. Principii de medicina interna-editia 14.Bucuresti: Teora, 2003: 1869-1878
Mondelli MU, Silini E. Clinical significance of hepatitis C genotypes. Hepatology 1999; 31: 65-70
Pawlotsky JM. Hepatitis C virus genetic variability: pathogenic and clinical implications. Clin Liver Dis 2003; 7:45-66
Westin J, Nordlinger H, Lagging M et al. Steatosis accelerates fibrosis development over time in hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infected patients. J Hepatol 2002; 36: 1266-1272
Palmer M.Guide to Hepatitis and Liver Disease. New York: Avery, 2004; 85-104
Seeff LB. Natural history of hepatitis C. IN: Biomedical research Reaports: Hepatitis C. London: Academic Press, 2002; 85-105
Villano SA, Vlahov D, Nelson KE et al. Persistence of viremia and importance of long-term follow-up after acute hepatitis C infection. Hepatology 1999; 29: 908-914
Read_full_article: pdf/23-2013/23-3-2013/SU23-3-2013-GrecV2.pdf
Correspondence: Grec Veronica, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Dental Medicine, Arad Romania, email:medicina@uvvg.ro

Read full article
Article Title: The evaluation of early viral response (RVT) and the assessment of haematological adverse effects
Authors: Veronica Grec, Eftimie Miuțescu
Affiliation: Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Dental Medicine, ″Vasile Goldis″ Western University of Arad, Romania
Abstract: The clinical consequence of chronic hepatitis C, the most important one is progressive liver fibrosis leading to cirrhosis, the last one may complicate in its turn with portal hypertension, liver failure and / or hepatocellular carcinoma. Recognition of fibrosis as an "engine" of cirrhogenous evolution of liver disease brought the need to assess this element in daily practice. Traditionally, liver biopsy followed by anatomopathological examination of the product is used for the assessment of liver fibrosis. In recent years, this invasive method associated with lower mortality, but constant (no series of liver biopsies punctures in the world published without associated mortality), which has limitations related to inter – and intra- observer, underestimation of hepatic cirrhosis and cost is replaced by noninvasive methods of usual assessment. Decreased blood cell response to therapy always occurs and can be grounds for a reduction of dosage or discontinuation. At 3 months of therapy, 76 % of patients had anemia, leucopenia 77 % and 41 % thrombocytopenia. Advanced Fibrosis is a major predictor of morbidity and mortality in chronic liver disease. Despite its limitations, liver biopsy remains the main method for staging liver fibrosis. Non-invasive tests are superior in detecting fibrosis as a dynamic phenomenon and in monitoring antifibrotic therapy. Using noninvasive methods (FibroMax) as first-line diagnostic protocol of liver fibrosis can avoid puncture in most patients. Noninvasive test results will be interpreted in clinical context. When results are unexplained liver puncture is indicated. Algorithm that associates biopsy and serological tests may become the best way of staging and monitoring of liver fibrosis.
Keywords: early viral response; viral C hepatitis; fibrosis
References: Shaw-Stffel T. Reference to Hepatitis C infection. London: Science Press 2004
Kim WR. Global epidemiology and burden of hepatitis C. Microbes and infection 2002; 4: 1119-1125
Lauer GM, Walker BD. Hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 41-52
Wasley A, Alter MJ. Epidemiology of hepatitis C: geographic differences and temporal trends. Semin liver dis 2000; 20:1-16
Armstrong GL,Alter MJ, McQuillianGM et al. The past incidence of hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology 2000;31:777-782
Hoofnagle JH. Hepatitis C. The Clinical Spectrum of Desease. Hepatology 1997; 26:15-20
Feitelson MA. Hepatitis C Virus: From Laboratory to Clinic. Cambridge University Press, 2002
Alter JH, Conry- Catilena C, Melpolder J et al. Hepatitis C in asymptomatic blood donors. Hepatology 1997; 26:29-33
Schvarcz R, Johansson B, Nystrom B. Nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus. Infection 1997; 25: 74-77
Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Isselbacher KJ et al. Harrison. Principii de medicina interna-editia 14.Bucuresti: Teora, 2003: 1869-1878
Mondelli MU, Silini E. Clinical significance of hepatitis C genotypes. Hepatology 1999; 31: 65-70
Pawlotsky JM. Hepatitis C virus genetic variability: pathogenic and clinical implications. Clin Liver Dis 2003; 7:45-66
Westin J, Nordlinger H, Lagging M et al. Steatosis accelerates fibrosis development over time in hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infected patients. J Hepatol 2002; 36: 1266-1272
Palmer M.Guide to Hepatitis and Liver Disease. New York: Avery, 2004; 85-104
Seeff LB. Natural history of hepatitis C. IN: Biomedical research Reaports: Hepatitis C. London: Academic Press, 2002; 85-105
Villano SA, Vlahov D, Nelson KE et al. Persistence of viremia and importance of long-term follow-up after acute hepatitis C infection. Hepatology 1999; 29: 908-914
*Correspondence: Grec Veronica, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Dental Medicine, Arad Romania, email:medicina@uvvg.ro